4.7 Article

Quantum Embedding Theory for Strongly Correlated States in Materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 2116-2125

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01258

关键词

-

资金

  1. MICCoM, as part of the Computational Materials Sciences Program - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division through Argonne National Laboratory [DEAC02-06CH11357]
  2. Office of Science of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum embedding theories provide a promising approach to investigate strongly correlated electronic states by considering screened Coulomb interactions and effective Hamiltonians, avoiding the need for the random phase approximation or evaluating virtual electronic orbitals. This allows for a detailed derivation of the theory and generalization to active spaces composed of non-eigenstate orbitals, as demonstrated in the study of spin defects in semiconductors.
Quantum embedding theories are promising approaches to investigate strongly correlated electronic states of active regions of large-scale molecular or condensed systems. Notable examples are spin defects in semiconductors and insulators. We present a detailed derivation of a quantum embedding theory recently introduced, which is based on the definition of effective Hamiltonians. The effect of the environment on a chosen active space is accounted for through screened Coulomb interactions evaluated using density functional theory. Importantly, the random phase approximation is not required, and the evaluation of virtual electronic orbitals is circumvented with algorithms previously developed in the context of calculations based on many-body perturbation theory. In addition, we generalize the quantum embedding theory to active spaces composed of orbitals that are not eigenstates of Kohn-Sham Hamiltonians. Finally, we report results for spin defects in semiconductors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据