4.5 Article

The Manchester perspective on using the Design Project to enhance the education of chemical engineering students

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.6725

关键词

Design Project; education; chemical engineering; perspective; best practices

资金

  1. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award [WM170003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Design Project in chemical engineering is a significant piece of work for undergraduate students, allowing them to showcase their skills, knowledge, and creativity. The Chemical Engineering Design Project at the University of Manchester has received international recognition and awards, and this article aims to share best education practices for the benefit of other programs.
The Design Project is a major piece of work for any undergraduate in chemical engineering, and it enables students to demonstrate skills and knowledge gained elsewhere in the degree programme alongside their own abilities to create and innovate. As such, the main learning process is activity based and associated with the undertaking of an open-ended, but time-limited, project that poses significant challenges to most students. Particularly in the UK context, the importance of the Design Project is recognized via its inclusion as a separate and very significant element in the accreditation of all engineering degrees. During the past decade, developments in the Chemical Engineering Design Project at the University of Manchester have led to international recognition and prestigious awards. This perspective article aims to identify the best education practices associated with the Manchester experience and to share these for the potential benefit of programmes elsewhere. The paper includes specific details regarding the module specifications, learning outcomes, organization of the Design Project activities, individual and team-based work, reporting requirements, assessment procedures, and other aspects. The feedback received annually from students and fellow Design Project programme directors from other universities is also considered and the different perspectives are evaluated. (c) 2021 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据