4.5 Article

Compartmental microfluidic system for studying muscle-neuron communication and neuromuscular junction maintenance

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 69-88

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2015.11.004

关键词

Microfluidic-chamber; Neuromuscular Junction; Axonal transport; Neurotrophic factors; Motoneuron

资金

  1. Rosetrees Trust
  2. ISF (Israel Science foundation) [561/11]
  3. ERC (European Research Council) [309377]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [309377] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular communication between the motoneuron and the muscle is vital for neuromuscular junction (NMJ) formation and maintenance. Disruption in the structure and function of NMJs is a hallmark of various neurodegenerative processes during both development and pathological events. Still due to the complexity of this process, it is very difficult to elucidate the cellular mechanisms underlying it, generating a keen interest for developing better tools for investigating it. Here we describe a simplified method to study mechanisms of NMJs formation, maintenance and disruption. A spinal cord explant from mice expressing the Hb9::GFP motoneuron marker is plated on one side of a compartmental chamber, and myotubes derived from muscle satellite progenitor cells are plated on the other. The GFP labeled motoneurons extend their axons via microgrooves in the chamber to innervate the muscle cells and to form functional in-vitro NMJs. Next we provide procedures to measure axon growth and to reliably quantify NMJ activity using imaging of both muscle contractions and fast intracellular calcium changes. This platform allows precise control, monitoring and manipulation of subcellular microenvironments. Specifically, it enables to distinguish local from retrograde signaling mechanisms and allows restricted experimental intervention in local compartments along the muscle-neuron route. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据