4.7 Article

Free energies of crystals computed using Einstein crystal with fixed center of mass and differing spring constants

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 154, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0044833

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eli Lilly
  2. National Science Foundation [CNS-1725797]
  3. California NanoSystems Institute
  4. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) at UC Santa Barbara [NSF DMR 1720256]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper extends previous work on free energy calculations of crystals using a center of mass constraint and finite-size corrections, focusing on crystals with differing spring constants. By comparing free energies calculated with different spring constants, the theory is tested and the intrinsic finite-size effects are eliminated. The calculations help demonstrate the impact of these finite-size corrections on the absolute free energy of crystals.
Free energies of crystals computed using a center of mass constraint require a finite-size correction, as shown in previous work by Polson et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5339-5342 (2000)]. Their reference system is an Einstein crystal with equal spring constants. In this paper, we extend the work of Polson et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 112, 5339-5342 (2000)] to the case of differing spring constants. The generalization is convenient for constraining the center of mass in crystals with atoms of differing masses, and it helps to optimize the free energy calculations. To test the theory, we compare the free energies of LiI and NaCl crystals from calculations with differing spring constants to those computed using equal spring constants. Using these center of mass finite size corrections, we compute the true free energies of these crystals for different system sizes to eliminate the intrinsic finite-size effects. These calculations help demonstrate the size of these finite-size corrections relative to other contributions to the absolute free energy of the crystals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据