4.7 Article

GGL-Tox: Geometric Graph Learning for Toxicity Prediction

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 1691-1700

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01294

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [GM126189]
  2. NSF [DMS-2052983, DMS-1761320, IIS-1900473]
  3. NASA [80NSSC21M0023]
  4. Michigan Economic Development Corporation, George Mason University [PD45722]
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb [65109]
  6. Pfizer
  7. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11972266, 11971367]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Toxicity analysis is a major challenge in drug design and discovery, and recent progress in machine learning, as demonstrated by the Tox21 Data Challenge, has shown promising results. The development of the GGL-Tox model, integrating MWCG features and GBDT algorithm, has proven to be an accurate and efficient method for toxicity analysis and prediction, as demonstrated through benchmark tests.
Toxicity analysis is a major challenge in drug design and discovery. Recently significant progress has been made through machine learning due to its accuracy, efficiency, and lower cost. US Toxicology in the 21st Century (Tox21) screened a large library of compounds, including approximately 12 000 environmental chemicals and drugs, for different mechanisms responsible for eliciting toxic effects. The Tox21 Data Challenge offered a platform to evaluate different computational methods for toxicity predictions.Inspired by the success of multiscale weighted colored graph (MWCG) theory in protein-ligand binding affinity predictions, we consider MWCG theory for toxicity analysis. In the present work, we develop a geometric graph learning toxicity (GGL-Tox) model by integrating MWCG features and the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) algorithm. The benchmark tests of the Tox21 Data Challenge are employed to demonstrate the utility and usefulness of the proposed GGL-Tox model. An extensive comparison with other state-of-the-art models indicates that GGL-Tox is an accurate and efficient model for toxicity analysis and prediction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据