4.5 Article

Interplay between SARS-CoV-2 and human long non-coding RNAs

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 5823-5827

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16596

关键词

Cis regulation; COVID-19; long non-coding RNA; SARS-CoV-2 genome; trans regulation

资金

  1. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified potential roles of lncRNAs in inflammation development during SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighted the major regulatory role of certain lncRNAs and their interactions with the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Importantly, mRNA-based vaccines are not expected to have side effects due to interactions with human lncRNAs.
The long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play a critical regulatory role in the host response to the viral infection. However, little is understood about the transcriptome architecture, especially lncRNAs pattern during the SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the present study, using publicly available RNA sequencing data of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) samples from COVID-19 patients and healthy individuals, three interesting findings highlighted: (a) More than half of the interactions between lncRNAs-PCGs of BALF samples established by three trans-acting lncRNAs (HOTAIRM1, PVT1 and AL392172.1), which also exhibited the high affinity for binding to the SARS-CoV-2 genome, suggesting the major regulatory role of these lncRNAs during the SARS-CoV-2 infection. (b) lncRNAs of MALAT1 and NEAT1 are possibly contributed to the inflammation development in the SARS-CoV-2 infected cells. (c) In contrast to the 3 ' part of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, the 5 ' part can interact with many human lncRNAs. Therefore, the mRNA-based vaccines will not show any side effects because of the off-label interactions with the human lncRNAs. Overall, the putative functionalities of lncRNAs can be promising to design the non-coding RNA-based drugs and to inspect the efficiency of vaccines to overcome the current pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据