4.4 Review

Radiopharmaceuticals: An insight into the latest advances in medical uses and regulatory perspectives

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-021-00147-5

关键词

Diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals; gamma and positron emission tomography; radiopharmaceuticals; regulation; theranostic radiopharmaceuticals; therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article discusses the importance and development trends of radioisotopes and radiopharmaceuticals in modern healthcare, emphasizing safety and effectiveness issues in regulation, as well as the challenges and uncertainties that exist in the field.
The growing armamentarium of potential radioisotopes and increased demand for radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) have catapulted their biomedical applications on a trajectory of higher growth in the modern healthcare establishment. Nuclear medicine technology is now regarded as an essential tool for diagnosis, palliation, therapy, and theranostic applications. The associated radiation safety issues need to be emphasized in the form of adequate regulatory action to warrant their safe and effective use. The RPs attracts considerable attention from both pharmaceutical and nuclear regulators due to their constituent pharmaceutical and radioactive components. So, a critical examination of applications of RPs, the latest advances in their development, and the existing regulatory guidelines for RPs have been carried out. This review presents a brief overview of RPs and recent studies on their diagnostic, therapeutic, and theranostic applications. Comprehensive comparative information on regulatory perspectives of RPs in major pharmaceutical jurisdictions such as the United States (US), the European Union (EU), and India reveals ambiguities and heterogeneity. The present studies discuss the importance of RPs in the current healthcare domain, their recent applications, and strive to intensify the concern for an ambient and harmonized regulatory setup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据