4.7 Article

Multiple machine learning, molecular docking, and ADMET screening approach for identification of selective inhibitors of CYP1B1

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE & DYNAMICS
卷 40, 期 17, 页码 7975-7990

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2021.1905552

关键词

machine learning; molecular docking; molecular dynamics; ADMET

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi [ISRM/12(10)/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized in-silico approaches to identify selective CYP1B1 inhibitors, screening for the most stable inhibitors through molecular docking analysis, which may offer a new avenue for addressing resistance in tumors.
Cytochrome P4501B1 is a ubiquitous family protein that is majorly overexpressed in tumors and is responsible for biotransformation-based inactivation of anti-cancer drugs. This inactivation marks the cause of resistance to chemotherapeutics. In the present study, integrated in-silico approaches were utilized to identify selective CYP1B1 inhibitors. To achieve this objective, we initially developed different machine learning models corresponding to two isoforms of the CYP1 family i.e. CYP1A1 and CYP1B1. Subsequently, small molecule databases including ChemBridge, Maybridge, and natural compound library were screened from the selected models of CYP1B1 and CYP1A1. The obtained CYP1B1 inhibitors were further subjected to molecular docking and ADMET analysis. The selectivity of the obtained hits for CYP1B1 over the other isoforms was also judged with molecular docking analysis. Finally, two hits were found to be the most stable which retained key interactions within the active site of CYP1B1 after the molecular dynamics simulations. Novel compound with CYP-D9 and CYP-14 IDs were found to be the most selective CYP1B1 inhibitors which may address the issue of resistance. Moreover, these compounds can be considered as safe agents for further cell-based and animal model studies. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据