4.6 Article

Binary polymer blend of ArPTU/PI with advanced comprehensive dielectric properties and ultra-high thermally stability

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 39, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.50997

关键词

blends; dielectric properties; thermal properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51907187]
  2. Institute of Electrical Engineering, CAS [E155440301]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0100600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of polymer blend films were prepared from ArPTU and PI, with the blend film containing 10wt% ArPTU showing the best overall performance in terms of dielectric properties, energy density, and heat resistance. The good compatibility between ArPTU and PI with similar polarity is responsible for the improved properties, suggesting potential applications in high-temperature dielectric areas.
Flexible high-temperature polymeric dielectrics with advanced dielectric properties are urgently demanded in various applications. In this work, series of polymer blend films were prepared from aromatic polythiourea (ArPTU) and polyimide (PI). The experimental results revealed that the blend films were properly engineered to achieve higher breakdown strength, greater dielectric constant, and larger energy density than pure PI film. For instance, the optimum property was obtained from the blend film with 10 wt% ArPTU, exhibiting prominent dielectric properties (K = 4.52, E-b = 443 MV/m), enhanced energy density (4.00 J/cm(3)) as well as excellent heat resistance (T-g = 419 degrees C). In addition, stable dielectric properties at broad temperature range from -50 to 250 degrees C were also acquired. It is deduced that the good compatibility from ArPTU and PI with similar polarity are responsible for the improved properties. The superior comprehensive properties which combine the advantages of ArPTU and PI suggest the potential applications of ArPTU/PI blend film in high-temperature dielectric areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据