4.7 Article

In-situ catalytic upgrading of bio-oil derived from fast pyrolysis of sunflower stalk to aromatic hydrocarbons over bifunctional Cu-loaded HZSM-5

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105079

关键词

Bio-oil; Catalytic upgrading; HZSM-5; Cu modification; Fast pyrolysis; Aromatic hydrocarbons

资金

  1. Hirosaki University Fund
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu-modified HZSM-5 catalyst showed improved catalytic performance in upgrading bio-oil, with higher aromatic hydrocarbons yield attributed to suitable acidity and optimal Cu loading amount. Moreover, the catalyst exhibited excellent reusability and regeneration property.
Commercial HZSM-5 zeolite (Si/Al = 24) was modified with Cu species using the wet impregnation method, and applied in the in-situ upgrading of bio-oil from the fast sunflower stalk pyrolysis with a catalyst to biomass ratio of 1:1 at 500 ?C. The main objective was to study the Cu doping effect on the HZSM-5 catalytic performance in terms of the selectivity to aromatic hydrocarbons (especially the specific aromatic hydrocarbons including benzene, toluene and xylene) yield. It was found that Cu/HZSM-5 with low Cu loading amounts preserved HZSM5 crystalline structure as well as its acid sites. The HZSM-5 with 0.5 wt.% Cu loading amount exhibited the best catalytic performance with a high relative amount of aromatic hydrocarbons of 73.2 % and a yield of specific aromatic hydrocarbons as high as 56.5 mg/g-biomass (d.a.f), which were much higher than those based on the parent HZSM-5 (55.0 % and 26.0 mg/g-biomass (d.a.f)). It should be mainly attributed to its suitable acidity and best textural properties for the deoxygenation of the bio-oil thanks to the optimum Cu loading amount. In addition, the 0.5 wt.% Cu loaded HZSM-5 catalyst also showed excellent catalytic reusability and regeneration property, and the spent catalyst was easily recovered by a simple calcination in air for a short time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据