4.5 Article

Cortical Thickness, Volume, and Surface Area in the Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 81, 期 2, 页码 651-665

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-201576

关键词

Cognitive complaint; cortical thickness; gait; motoric cognitive risk

资金

  1. NIH/NIA [1R56AG057548-01, R01AG057548-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals with MCR have lower overall cortical thickness, particularly in regions associated with human locomotion, social, cognitive, affective, and motor functions. Cortical atrophy in MCR is easier to detect in thickness than volume and surface area due to its sensitivity to aging processes.
Background: The motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome is a pre-clinical stage of dementia characterized by slow gait and cognitive complaint. Yet, the brain substrates of MCR are not well established. Objective: To examine cortical thickness, volume, and surface area associated with MCR in the MCR-Neuroimaging Consortium, which harmonizes image processing/analysis of multiple cohorts. Methods: Two-hundred MRIs (M age 72.62 years; 47.74%female; 33.17%MCR) from four different cohorts (50 each) were first processed with FreeSurfer 6.0, and then analyzed using multivariate and univariate general linear models with 1,000 bootstrapped samples (n-1; with resampling). All models adjusted for age, sex, education, white matter lesions, total intracranial volume, and study site. Results: Overall, cortical thickness was lower in individuals with MCR than in those without MCR. There was a trend in the same direction for cortical volume (p = 0.051). Regional cortical thickness was also lower among individuals with MCR than individuals without MCR in prefrontal, insular, temporal, and parietal regions. Conclusion: Cortical atrophy in MCR is pervasive, and include regions previously associated with human locomotion, but also social, cognitive, affective, and motor functions. Cortical atrophy in MCR is easier to detect in cortical thickness than volume and surface area because thickness is more affected by healthy and pathological aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据