4.5 Article

Short-Term Memory Binding Distinguishing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment from Healthy Aging: A Machine Learning Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 81, 期 2, 页码 729-742

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-201447

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amnestic mild cognitive impairment; cognitive markers; healthy aging; machine learning

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion (MINCIENCIAS)
  2. COLFUTURO Ph.D. Scholarship for National Students [647]
  3. MINCIENCIAS [1106-744-55314]
  4. Sistema General de Regalias [BPIN2018000100059]
  5. Universidad del Valle [CI 5316, CI 5292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is the most common preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The study aimed to compare machine learning architectures for classifying and predicting aMCI, assessing the contribution of cognitive measures such as memory binding function in aMCI distinction and prediction. Results indicated that AdaBoost, gradient boosting, and XGBoost had the highest performance in classifying aMCI, while decision tree and random forest had the highest performance in predictive routines.
Background: Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is the mostcommonpreclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD). A strategy to reduce the impact of AD is the early aMCI diagnosis and clinical intervention. Neuroimaging, neurobiological, and genetic markers have proved to be sensitive and specific for the early diagnosis of AD. However, the high cost of these procedures is prohibitive in low-income and middle-income countries (LIMCs). The neuropsychological assessments currently aim to identify cognitive markers that could contribute to the early diagnosis of dementia. Objective: Compare machine learning (ML) architectures classifying and predicting aMCI and asset the contribution of cognitive measures including binding function in distinction and prediction of aMCI. Methods: We conducted a two-year follow-up assessment of a sample of 154 subjects with a comprehensive multidomain neuropsychological battery. Statistical analysis was proposed using complete ML architectures to compare subjects' performance to classify and predict aMCI. Additionally, permutation importance and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) routines were implemented for feature importance selection. Results: AdaBoost, gradient boosting, and XGBoost had the highest performance with over 80% success classifying aMCI, and decision tree and random forest had the highest performance with over 70% success predictive routines. Feature importance points, the auditory verbal learning test, short-term memory binding tasks, and verbal and category fluency tasks were used as variables with the first grade of importance to distinguish healthy cognition and aMCI. Conclusion: Although neuropsychological measures do not replace biomarkers' utility, it is a relatively sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for aMCI. Further studies with ML must identify cognitive performance that differentiates conversion from average MCI to the pathological MCI observed in AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据