4.7 Article

Investigation in the ternary Ta-Ni-P system: Solid state phase equilibria at T=1070 K, crystal and electronic structures of new ternary phosphides

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 864, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158122

关键词

Intermetallics; Crystal structure; Solid-state solution; Phase equilibria; X-ray diffraction

资金

  1. Energimyndigheten [46595-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solid-state phase diagram of the ternary Ta-Ni-P system at T=1070 K was established using PXRD methods, with the identification of six ternary compounds and the discovery of various crystal structure types.
The solid state phase diagram for the ternary Ta-Ni-P system was established at T=1070 K in the region of up to 67 at% of P by means of X-ray powder diffraction methods (PXRD). Six ternary compounds, namely Ta4NiP (Nb4CoSi-type), Ta1.10-0.82Ni0.90-1.18P (TiNiSi-type), TaNiP2 (NbNiP2-type), Ta(5.00-4.81)Ni(4.00-4.19)P4 (Nb5Cu4Si4-type), TaNi2P (own structure type) and Ta1-0.08(1)Ni0.08(1)P2 (OsGe2-type) have been confirmed to exist. Rather minor Ta/Ni homogeneity ranges have been found for alpha-Ta3-xNixP (x=0.2) (Ti3P-type), Ta1-xNixP (x=0.18) (NbAs-type), Ni3-xTaxP (x=0.2) (Ni3P-type) and Ni2-xTaxP (x=0.25) (Fe2P-type). The crystal structure of Ta4.811(9)Ni4.189(9)P4 has been refined from single crystal X-ray diffraction data (Nb5Cu4Si4-type, space group I4/m, a =9.8474(17), c=3.5182(7) angstrom, R1=0.0283, wR2=0.0470), while that of the new TaNi2P compound was determined by means of PXRD. This phosphide crystalizes in its own structure type (space group Pnma, a=8.3588(3), b=3.5208(1), c=6.7051(3) angstrom, R-I=0.044, R-P=0.161). A new isostructural Fe-compound, TaFe2P (a=8.358(2), b=3.5194(7), c=6.703(1) angstrom), was also synthetized. The electronic structures of Ta5Ni4P4 and TaNi2P were analyzed using the tight-binding linear muffin-tin orbital (TB-LMTO) and extended Huckel methods. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据