4.7 Article

Achievement of extra-high thermoelectric performance in doped copper (I) sulfide

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 878, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160128

关键词

Thermoelectricity; Semiconductor; Energy conversion; Electrical property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21371049, 20971036, 51372070]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province [162300410022]
  3. Key Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Henan Province, China [202102310598]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of nontoxic and inexpensive thermoelectric Cu2S-based materials can increase the application of thermoelectric materials in energy conversion. Doping significantly enhances the electrical conductivity and thermoelectric performance of Cu2S, leading to improved power factor and ZT values in doped Cu2S alloys.
The development of nontoxic and inexpensive thermoelectric copper (I) sulfide (Cu2S)-based materials could enable an increase in the application of thermoelectric materials in the domain of energy conversion. By using melt quenching, mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering, we successfully prepared doped and undoped Cu2S with excellent thermoelectric properties. Owing to the increase of carrier concentration, the electrical conductivity of the dopants enhanced from 2.0 x 10(4) S/m to 1.0 x 10(5) S/m, with the highest value acquired for Mn doped Cu2S of about 1.0 x 10(5) S/m at 350 K. Besides, Cu1.8Sn0.1Mn0.1S, Cu1.9Mn0.1S, and Cu1.9Sn0.1S followed an increasing variation in Seebeck coefficient with final values of 325 mu V K-1, 322 mu V K-1, and 294 mu V K-1 at 800 K, respectively. The maximum power factor of 3.24 mW m(-1) K-2 is obtained for Cu1.9Mn0.1S at 650 K, which is about 40 times greater than undoped Cu2S (0.08 mW m(-1) K-2). At the same time, a peak ZT of 1.63 is attained at 700 K for Cu1.9Mn0.1S, which is about 18 times enhanced over undoped Cu2S (0.09). (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据