4.7 Article

Crystal growth and thermal annealing of AgGaGe5Se12 crystal

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 862, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158002

关键词

Mid-infrared nonlinear optical crystal; AgGaGe5Se12; Polycrystal synthesis; Single crystal growth; Raman spectrum

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702222]
  2. Sichuan science and technology program [2019YFG0281]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030310578]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AgGaGe5Se12 is a new quaternary nonlinear optical crystal used for laser frequency conversion, and high-quality single crystals have been grown using the modified Bridgman method. The crystal structure was refined using the Rietveld method, and XRS results were analyzed comparing with other crystals. Additionally, the crystal showed high transparency in the spectral range of 0.6-15 μm after annealing.
AgGaGe5Se12 is a new quaternary nonlinear optical crystal which is applied to laser frequency conversion, especially converting 1.064 mu m light to mid-IR range. In this work, we have synthesized the AgGaGe5Se12 polycrystal by the two-zones temperature method. By the modified Bridgman method, we have grown high-quality AgGaGe5Se12 single crystal 30 mm in diameter and 50 mm in length. The structure refinement was carried out by the Rietveld method. Besides, the XRS results were analyzed by comparing with AgGaGeS4 and AgGaGe5Se12. In addition, the non-polarized Raman spectra were recorded and the intense peaks were observed at 200 and 232 cm(-1). The peaks were attributed to corner-sharing (CS) and edge-sharing (ES) clusters. At last, the crystal was characterized by a high transparency in the 0.6-15 mu m spectral range and the absorptions at 3.4 and 7 mu m, observed in the as-grown crystal, have been eliminated after annealing. Thus, AgGaGe5Se12 is appropriate for further optical experiments and more comprehensive applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据