4.7 Article

Characterization of Cu2ZnSnS4 thin films deposited by one-step thermal evaporation for a third generation solar cell

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 862, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158503

关键词

CZTS; Solar cell; TiO2 nanorod; Thin film

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, phase-pure CZTS thin films were successfully fabricated on glass substrates using one-step thermal evaporation technique. The optimized CZTS thin films showed a band gap of 1.47 eV and were utilized to construct a TiO2 NRs based solar cell with a record efficiency of 0.61%.
In this study, one-step thermal evaporation was employed for the fabrication of phase-pure CZTS thin films on glass substrates from single crystalline Cu-poor ingot grown by Bridgman technique. Structural analyses revealed the formation of a mono-phase CZTS kesterite structure for the thin films annealed at 450 degrees C under N-2 atmosphere. The AFM measurements demonstrated significant morphological changes in films with increasing the annealing temperature from 200 degrees C to 450 degrees C, supporting the results obtained via XRD and Raman studies. From the optical measurements, the band gap was estimated to be 1.47 eV for the CZTS film annealed at 450 degrees C, which is close to the optimum value required for photovoltaic applications. As a device application of the optimized CZTS thin films, an attempt was made to construct a TiO2 NRs based and CdS-free FTO/TiO2 NRs/CZTS/Ag superstrate CZTS solar cells. TiO2 NRs were grown by hydrothermal technique, which offers a simple and a cost-effective route for large-scale production of one-dimensional nanostructures. The solar cell exhibited an open-circuit voltage of 0.35 V, a short-circuit current density of 7.28 mA/cm(2), a fill factor of 23.9% and a power conversion efficiency of 0.61%, the highest efficiency recorded so far for a single-dimensional TiO2 nanostructures based superstrate CZTS solar cell. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据