4.7 Article

Bamboo-like N/S-codoped carbon nanotube aerogels for high-power and high-energy supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 861, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157946

关键词

Bamboo-like; N/S-codoped; Carbon nanotube; High-performance; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22005174]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel bamboo-like N/S-codoped carbon nanotube aerogels were fabricated through MnO2-templated polymerization, showing high supercapacitive performances with a specific capacitance of 328 F g(-1), a rate capability of 66.5%, an energy density of 45.6 Wh kg(-1) and a capacity retention of 97.4%.
Three-dimensional carbon aerogels with high surface area, low cost and excellent structural stability, have shown extraordinary promise for supercapacitors (SCs). Pore-forming and heteroatom-doping have been reported to play an important role in improving the power and energy densities of nanostructured carbon electrodes. We propose novel bamboo-like N/S-codoped carbon nanotube aerogels (NS-CNAs) facilely fabricated through MnO2-templated polymerization, freeze-drying and calcination. The cryptomelane-type MnO2 nanowires are served as self-sacrificing templates and oxidative initiators for polymerization of pyrrole in acidic environment. XPS analysis can confirm the N content of 4.09% and the S content of 0.66%, which are mainly derived from PPy with nitrogen-containing skeletons and PSS with sulfonic acid groups respectively. Based on porous structure and N/S codoping, the assembled NS-CNA SC can provide high supercapacitive performances, such as a specific capacitance of 328 F g(-1) (at 1 A g(-1)), the rate capability of 66.5% (from 1 A g(-1) to 10 A g(-1)), an energy density of 45.6 Wh kg(-1) (at 0.5 kW kg(-1)) and the capacity retention of 97.4% (after 10,000 cycles), opening up a highly-efficient approach to developing high-performance supercapacitors. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据