4.5 Article

A Deep Learning Model with Conv-LSTM Networks for Subway Passenger Congestion Delay Prediction

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION
卷 2021, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6645214

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1200702]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new method based on deep learning technology to evaluate congestion delays in subway stations of urban rail transit. By using AFC data and Conv-LSTM network to extract spatial and temporal characteristics, it solves the short-term prediction problem of subway congestion delays.
When urban rail transit is faced with a large number of commuter passengers during peak periods, passengers are often waiting for the next train because the subway is running at full load, which causes delays to the overall travel time of passengers. The calculation and prediction of the congestion delay in subway stations can guide the operation department and passengers to make better planning and selection. In this paper, we use a new method based on deep learning technology to evaluate the congestion delay of subway stations. Firstly, we use automatic fare collection (AFC) system data to evaluate the congestion delays of stations. Then, we use a convolutional long short-term memory (Conv-LSTM) network to extract spatial and temporal characteristics to solve the short-term prediction problem of the subway congestion delay in the network structure. The spatiotemporal variables include inbound passenger flow, outbound passenger flow, number of passengers delayed, and average delay time. As a spatiotemporal sequence, the input and prediction targets are both spatiotemporal three-dimensional tensors in the end-to-end training model. The effectiveness of the method is verified by a case study of the Chongqing Rail Transit. Experimental results show that Conv-LSTM is better than the benchmark models in capturing spatial and temporal correlation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据