4.6 Article

Synthesis and Thermodynamic Investigation of Energy Materials in the Ag-Te-Cl System by the Solid-State Galvanic Cells

期刊

JOM
卷 73, 期 5, 页码 1487-1494

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-021-04619-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. national projects of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine: Synthesis, physico-chemical and thermodynamic properties of nanosized and nanostructured materials for electrochemical systems'' [0120U102184]
  2. Academy of Finland project as part of the activities of the Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre at Abo Akademi University [311537]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study experimentally evaluated the phase stabilities and thermodynamic properties of selected compounds in the Ag-Te-Cl system, identifying the formation of four new compounds below 500 K. By conducting careful electrochemical measurements in galvanic cells, the standard thermodynamic quantities of ternary compounds in the Ag-Te-Cl system were determined for the first time.
Discoveries of new energy materials with unique properties and wider thermal stability ranges enable sustainable developments toward a low-carbon society. In this work, phase stabilities and thermodynamic properties of selected compounds in the Ag-Te-Cl system with potential application as energy materials have been critically reviewed and experimentally investigated. Based on the literature data on phase formations in the AgCl-Ag2Te-Te part of the Ag-Te-Cl system and the results of electromotive force (EMF) measurements in this work, formations of the Ag19Te6Cl7, Ag10Te4Cl3, Ag5Te2Cl, and Ag23Te12Cl compounds below 500 K were established. The EMF measurements were performed in carefully built galvanic cells with positive electrodes prepared from finely ground mixtures of pure substances Ag, Te, and AgCl. Based on the temperature dependences of the EMF of the cells, the standard thermodynamic quantities of the ternary compounds of the Ag-Te-Cl system were experimentally determined for the first time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据