4.7 Article

Tumour-free margins in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: Does distance really matter?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 139-149

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.006

关键词

Vulvar cancer; Surgical treatment; Meta-analysis; Tumour-free margin; Local recurrence

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There is no consensus on the width of tumour-free margins after surgery for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Most current guidelines recommend tumour-free margins of >= 8 mm. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a margin of <8 mm is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in VSCC. Methods: A meta-analysis of the available literature and a cohort study of 148 VSCC patients seen at a referral centre from 2000 to 2012 was performed. The primary end-point of the cohort study was a histologically confirmed ipsilateral local recurrence within 2 years after primary treatment in relation to the margin distance. Results: Based on 10 studies, the meta-analysis showed that a tumour-free margin of <8 mm is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence compared to a tumour-free margin of >= 8 mm (pooled risk ratio, 1.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.13-3.51], p = 0.02). In the cohort study, we found no clear difference in the risk of local recurrence in the <8 versus >= 8 mm group; however, 40% of the patients in the <8 mm group received additional treatment. Tumour-positive margin was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.21 [95% CI: 0.08-0.55]). Conclusions: This work provides important data to question the commonly used 8-mm margin as a prognosticator for local recurrence. More research is needed to address the question of whether additional treatment improves the prognosis in patients with a tumour-free margin of <8 mm. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据