4.7 Article

Clinical outcome of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone: Subgroup analysis of a randomised phase III trial, GEST study.

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 96-103

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.002

关键词

Elderly patients; Pancreatic cancer; Gemcitabine; S-1; Subgroup analysis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In the GEST study of unresectable pancreatic cancer, S-1 demonstrated non-inferiority compared to gemcitabine, but gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) did not show superiority over gemcitabine for overall survival (OS). We performed subgroup analysis of these data focused on the efficacy and safety of these regimens as a first-line treatment for elderly patients. Methods: Elderly patients (>= 70 years, n = 261) treated for unresectable pancreatic cancer (GS: n = 90, S-1: n = 85 and gemcitabine: n = 86) were analysed. Results: No significant differences between the GS, S-1, or gemcitabine groups in OS (median: 10.2, 8.0 and 8.5 months, respectively) or objective response rates (27.6%, 25.3% and 14.3%, respectively) were noted. Grade >= III adverse haematological events were observed more frequently in GS-treated than in S-1- or gemcitabine-treated elderly patients (p < 0.001 and p=0.016, respectively). Four of 8 patients aged >= 80 years experienced serious adverse events. Conclusions: S-1 and gemcitabine are both efficacious options for treatment of elderly patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Conversely, first-line treatment of elderly patients with GS should only be used after careful consideration. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据