4.5 Article

Nano α-Fe2O3 synthesized using EDTA-aqueous solution simple and novel method: improved capacity retention at 1 C rate as anode for high rate performance of lithium-ion batteries

期刊

IONICS
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 2847-2855

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-021-04075-0

关键词

EDTA-prepared sample; High rate performance; Discharge capacity; Lithium ion batteries; Energy storage

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two samples with different structural properties of nano alpha-Fe2O3 were successfully synthesized using different preparation methods. The EDTA-prepared sample showed the best textural structure, supporting the high rate performance of lithium-ion batteries. Comparison with other studies confirmed the novelty and efficiency of the EDTA-prepared sample.
Depending on different preparation methods, two samples of nano alpha- Fe2O3, in addition to the commercial one, having different structural properties were successfully synthesized. All samples were characterized using different techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Brunauer - Emmett - Teller (BET) nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm, and a vibrating sample magnetometer. All structural characterization parameters exhibited that the EDTA-prepared sample has the best textural structure, which support the electrochemical properties concerning the charge-discharge processes for the high rate performance of lithium-ion batteries. All results showed good anode electrochemical performance of EDTA-prepared sample at the high rates of 1 C and 2 C, especially the first electrochemical cycles of charge-discharge processes. A comparison with other recent previous related studies was performed to confirm the novelty and efficiency of EDTA-prepared sample for the high rate performance of lithium-ion batteries applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据