4.7 Article

1-D transient microbial fuel cell simulation considering biofilm growth and temperature variation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106801

关键词

Microbial fuel cell; Mathematical modeling; Biofilm; Renewable energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a dynamic, one-dimensional mathematical model for MFCs with a two-chamber structure and multi-species biofilm, coupling energy, mass, and charge conservation equations. The model's parameters were estimated and validated through experimental data, predicting the influence of temperature, boundary conditions, and substrate concentration variations on MFC performance. The model showed that power density can increase by 22.5% per 10 degrees C temperature increase at the maximum point, providing insights for optimizing design and operational conditions in MFCs.
Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are a new bio-reactor which can recover energy contained in the chemical bonds of complex organic materials with simultaneous wastewater treatment. Unfortunately, there are many unsolved challenges on MFCs modelling, one of those challenges is related to temperature effects on MFCs behavior, which there are only a very few numerical studies, where conducted on this issue numerically. This study presents a dynamic, one-dimensional mathematical model for MFCs, with multi-species biofilm in a two-chamber structure, which developed by coupling energy, mass and charge conservation equations. The model parameters are estimated and validated by best-fitting regression method using experimental data obtained from literatures (Maximum relative error is 8%). The model predicts influence of temperature, boundary condition, and substrate concentration variation on MFC performance. The model revealed that the power density can increase 22.5% per 10 degrees C temperature augmentation in maximum point. The proposed model should be helpful for the optimization of the design and operation conditions in MFCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据