4.3 Article

On the Determination of the Output Power in Mono/Multicrystalline Photovoltaic Cells

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHOTOENERGY
卷 2021, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6692598

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key research project of Guangdong University of Science amp
  2. Technology [GKY-2020KYZDK-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two AI-based models were proposed to determine the output power of different types of photovoltaic cells, showing high accuracy in estimation. Sensitivity analysis revealed that light intensity has a significant impact on output power.
In the present work, two artificial intelligence-based models were proposed to determine the output power of two types of photovoltaic cells including multicrystalline (multi-) and monocrystalline (mono-). Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and Least-squares support vector machine (LSSVM) are applied for the output power calculations. The estimation results are very close to the actual data based on graphical and statistical analysis. The coefficients of determination (R-2) of monocrystalline cell output power for LSSVM and ANFIS models are as 0.997 and 0.962, respectively. Additionally, multicells have R-2 values of 0.999 and 0.995 for LSSVM and ANFIS, respectively. The acceptable values for R-2 and various error parameters prove the accuracy of suggested models. The visualization of these comparisons clarifies the accuracy of suggested models. Additionally, the proposed models are compared with previously published machine learning methods. The accurate performance of proposed models in comparison with others showed that our models can be helpful tools for the estimation of output power. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis for the effects of inputs parameters on output power has been employed. The sensitivity output shows that light intensity has more on output power. The outcomes of this study provide interesting tools which have potential to apply in different parts of renewable energy industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据