4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of bupivacaine multivesicular liposome: A QbD study about the effects of formulation and process on critical quality attributes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120335

关键词

Bupivacaine; Liposome; QbD; Particle size; Morphology; Encapsulation efficiency

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [201802010047]
  2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team special Fund project of Guangdong Province [2014ZT05Y018]
  3. Biomedical Innovation Institution of Hong Kong & Guangdong Pharmaceutical University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study extends QbD principles to liposomal products with a hydrophilic API, demonstrating the feasibility and advantages of the concept for multivesicular liposome-based systems. The preparation process significantly affects the particle size and drug encapsulation efficiency of liposomes, with material attributes and processing parameters playing key roles. Risk assessment was used to monitor factors affecting encapsulation rate and particle size.
This study extends QbD principles to liposomal products containing a hydrophilic active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The feasibility and advantages of the QbD concept for multivesicular liposome-based systems were demonstrated. We selected the local anesthetic drug bupivacaine as a model compound. Desired properties for three critical attributes of multivesicular liposome drug products, namely, the particle size, morphology, and drug encapsulation efficiency, were defined and evaluated. The liposome preparation process significantly affected both the liposome particle size and drug encapsulation efficiency. In this study, the effects of material attributes and processing parameters during the preparation of liposomes were studied in detail using a microscope and particle size analyzer. We used risk assessment to monitor several factors that substantially affect the encapsulation rate and particle size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据