4.2 Article

Characteristics and overall survival in pediatric versus adult esthesioneuroblastoma: A population-based study

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110696

关键词

Esthesioneuroblastoma; Olfactory neuroblastoma; Sinonasal cancer; Pediatric malignancy; Skull base surgery; Pediatric oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparing characteristics and outcomes of Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) between pediatric and adult patients showed that pediatric patients had improved overall survival and were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Race was associated with decreased survival in pediatric patients, and they also had shorter length of stay and lived closer to their providers compared to adult ENB patients. Further larger studies are needed to validate these findings.
Background: Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) is an uncommon sinonasal malignancy and is even less common in the pediatric population. Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare characteristics and outcomes of ENB between adult and pediatric patients. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with histologically proven ENB of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, and then baseline characteristics, treatment, and survival data compared between lthe pediatric (age < 18 years) and adult (age > 18 years) populations. Results: 1411 patients were identified, with 45 in the pediatric cohort and 1366 in the adult cohort. Ten-year overall survival (OS) in the pediatric cohort was improved compared to the adult cohort, 87% and 66%, respectively (p < 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy was more commonly utilized in the pediatric cohort (p < 0.001). Race was associated with decreased OS in the pediatric cohort (p = 0.013). Pediatric patients had shorter length of stay (p = 0.009) and lived closer to their provider (p = 0.044) than adult ENB patients. Conclusion: Treatment of ENB in pediatric patients more commonly includes chemotherapy and more commonly occurs at academic medical centers. OS is improved in pediatric ENB compared to adults as well, but larger studies are necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据