4.7 Review

Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094981

关键词

head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; biomarker; human papilloma virus; checkpoint inhibitors; combined positive score; tumor mutational burden; tumor microenvironment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is a heterogeneous disease arising from the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract, with only about one third of patients responding to checkpoint inhibitors. HPV status and combined positive score are the main biomarkers used in clinical practice, while other factors like tumor mutational burden and immune microenvironment show promise but require validation in prospective trials.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a heterogeneous disease arising from the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract. Despite multimodality treatments approximately half of all patients with locally advanced disease relapse and the prognosis of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC is dismal. The introduction of checkpoint inhibitors improved the treatment options for these patients and pembrolizumab alone or in combination with a platinum and fluorouracil is now the standard of care for first-line therapy. However, approximately only one third of unselected patients respond to this combination and the response rate to checkpoint inhibitors alone is even lower. This shows that there is an urgent need to improve prognostication and prediction of treatment benefits in patients with HNSCC. In this review, we summarize the most relevant risk factors in the field and discuss their roles and limitations. The human papilloma virus (HPV) status for patients with oropharyngeal cancer and the combined positive score are the only biomarkers consistently used in clinical routine. Other factors, such as the tumor mutational burden and the immune microenvironment have been highly studied and are promising but need validation in prospective trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据