4.7 Article

Malignant Ascites Promote Adhesion of Ovarian Cancer Cells to Peritoneal Mesothelium and Fibroblasts

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084222

关键词

cancer cell adhesion; malignant ascites; ovarian cancer; peritoneal metastases

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2017/25/B/NZ3/00122, 2020/37/B/NZ5/00100]
  2. Social Health Insurance Project, Republic of Kazakhstan [SHIP2.3/CS-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that malignant ascites (MAs) promoted the adhesion of cancer cells to peritoneal cells more efficiently than benign ascites (BAs), possibly through the modulation of various growth factors affecting the interaction between cancer cells and normal cells.
Although malignant ascites (MAs) are known to contribute to various aspects of ovarian cancer progression, knowledge regarding their role in the adhesion of cancer cells to normal peritoneal cells is incomplete. Here, we compared the effect of MAs and benign ascites (BAs) on the adhesion of A2780 and OVCAR-3 cancer cells to omentum-derived peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs) and peritoneal fibroblasts (PFBs). The results showed that MAs stimulated the adhesion of A2780 and OVCAR-3 cells to PMCs and PFBs more efficiently than did BAs, and the strongest binding occurred when both cancer and normal cells were exposed to the fluid. Intervention studies showed that MAs-driven adhesion of A2780 cells to PMCs/PFBs depends on the presence of TGF-beta 1 and HGF, whereas binding of OVCAR-3 cells was mediated by TGF-beta 1, GRO-1, and IGF-1. Moreover, MAs upregulated alpha 5 beta 1 integrin expression on PFBs but not on PMCs or cancer cells, vimentin expression in all cells tested, and ICAM-1 only in cancer cells. When integrin-linked kinase was neutralized in PMCs or PFBs, cancer cell adhesion to PMCs and PFBs decreased. Collectively, our report shows that MAs may contribute to the early stages of ovarian cancer metastasis by modulating the proadhesive interplay between normal and cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据