4.7 Review

Skin Pigmentation Abnormalities and Their Possible Relationship with Skin Aging

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073727

关键词

skin pigmentation abnormalities; skin aging; oxidative stress; DNA damage; telomere shortening; hormonal change; autophagy impairment

资金

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HP20C0131]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT)
  3. NRF [2018R1A5A2023127]
  4. Korea Health Promotion Institute [HP20C0131010021] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skin disorders with abnormal pigmentation, often difficult to manage due to uncertain etiology, are commonly seen with aging skin. The association between skin aging and pigmentation abnormalities may result from certain inherited disorders and therapeutic modalities, involving various molecular mechanisms such as oxidative stress and DNA damage.
Skin disorders showing abnormal pigmentation are often difficult to manage because of their uncertain etiology or pathogenesis. Abnormal pigmentation is a common symptom accompanying aging skin. The association between skin aging and skin pigmentation abnormalities can be attributed to certain inherited disorders characterized by premature aging and abnormal pigmentation in the skin and some therapeutic modalities effective for both. Several molecular mechanisms, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA mutations, DNA damage, telomere shortening, hormonal changes, and autophagy impairment, have been identified as involved in skin aging. Although each of these skin aging-related mechanisms are interconnected, this review examined the role of each mechanism in skin hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation to propose the possible association between skin aging and pigmentation abnormalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据