4.7 Article

Ribosome-Profiling Reveals Restricted Post Transcriptional Expression of Antiviral Cytokines and Transcription Factors during SARS-CoV-2 Infection

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073392

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; ribosome profiling; translation; interferon; cytokines; transcriptome; translatome; host response; innate immunity

资金

  1. CSIRO
  2. CSIRO CERC post-doctoral fellowships

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in over 2.2 million deaths, highlighting the importance of understanding the host response to SARS-CoV-2. This study found that SARS-CoV-2 infection restricts the expression of various transcription factors and antiviral cytokine genes at the post-transcriptional level, potentially leading to high viral load and immune dysregulation.
The global COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in over 2.2 million deaths. Disease outcomes range from asymptomatic to severe with, so far, minimal genotypic change to the virus so understanding the host response is paramount. Transcriptomics has become incredibly important in understanding host-pathogen interactions; however, post-transcriptional regulation plays an important role in infection and immunity through translation and mRNA stability, allowing tight control over potent host responses by both the host and the invading virus. Here, we apply ribosome profiling to assess post-transcriptional regulation of host genes during SARS-CoV-2 infection of a human lung epithelial cell line (Calu-3). We have identified numerous transcription factors (JUN, ZBTB20, ATF3, HIVEP2 and EGR1) as well as select antiviral cytokine genes, namely IFNB1, IFNL1,2 and 3, IL-6 and CCL5, that are restricted at the post-transcriptional level by SARS-CoV-2 infection and discuss the impact this would have on the host response to infection. This early phase restriction of antiviral transcripts in the lungs may allow high viral load and consequent immune dysregulation typically seen in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据