4.7 Article

Cerebral Apolipoprotein D Exits the Brain and Accumulates in Peripheral Tissues

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22084118

关键词

apolipoprotein D; basigin; protein accumulation; blood-brain barrier

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. Louise & Andre Charron Research Chair on Alzheimer disease
  3. Quebec Network on Aging-RQRV

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that ApoD can quickly and efficiently exit the CNS and reach the liver and kidneys/urine, organs associated with lipid and toxin recycling and excretion. Therefore, overexpression of ApoD in the brain during neurodegenerative episodes may help eliminate neurotoxic ApoD ligands.
Apolipoprotein D (ApoD) is a secreted lipocalin associated with neuroprotection and lipid metabolism. In rodent, the bulk of its expression occurs in the central nervous system. Despite this, ApoD has profound effects in peripheral tissues, indicating that neural ApoD may reach peripheral organs. We endeavor to determine if cerebral ApoD can reach the circulation and accumulate in peripheral tissues. Three hours was necessary for over 40% of all the radiolabeled human ApoD (hApoD), injected bilaterally, to exit the central nervous system (CNS). Once in circulation, hApoD accumulates mostly in the kidneys/urine, liver, and muscles. Accumulation specificity of hApoD in these tissues was strongly correlated with the expression of lowly glycosylated basigin (BSG, CD147). hApoD was observed to pass through bEnd.3 blood brain barrier endothelial cells monolayers. However, cyclophilin A did not impact hApoD internalization rates in bEnd.3, indicating that ApoD exit from the brain is either independent of BSG or relies on additional cell types. Overall, our data showed that ApoD can quickly and efficiently exit the CNS and reach the liver and kidneys/urine, organs linked to the recycling and excretion of lipids and toxins. This indicated that cerebral overexpression during neurodegenerative episodes may serve to evacuate neurotoxic ApoD ligands from the CNS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据