4.7 Review

The Chemistry of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Revisited: Outlining Their Role in Biological Macromolecules (DNA, Lipids and Proteins) and Induced Pathologies

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094642

关键词

ROS; oxidative stress; macromolecules

资金

  1. Junta de Castilla y Leon [FEDER-VA115P17, VA149G18]
  2. project APOGEO (Cooperation Program INTERREG-MAC 2014-2020)
  3. European Funds for Regional Development-FEDER
  4. Agencia Canaria de Investigacion, Innovacion y Sociedad de la Informacion (ACIISI) del Gobierno de Canarias [2020010134]
  5. CajaCanarias [2019SP43]
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [PID2019-105838RB-C31]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Living species are constantly exposed to oxidants, leading to oxidative stress and disease. The induction of oxidative stress is caused by an imbalance between radical species and antioxidant defense systems, which can damage cellular biomolecules.
Living species are continuously subjected to all extrinsic forms of reactive oxidants and others that are produced endogenously. There is extensive literature on the generation and effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in biological processes, both in terms of alteration and their role in cellular signaling and regulatory pathways. Cells produce ROS as a controlled physiological process, but increasing ROS becomes pathological and leads to oxidative stress and disease. The induction of oxidative stress is an imbalance between the production of radical species and the antioxidant defense systems, which can cause damage to cellular biomolecules, including lipids, proteins and DNA. Cellular and biochemical experiments have been complemented in various ways to explain the biological chemistry of ROS oxidants. However, it is often unclear how this translates into chemical reactions involving redox changes. This review addresses this question and includes a robust mechanistic explanation of the chemical reactions of ROS and oxidative stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据