4.7 Article

Nanoscale Surface Topography Modulates hIAPP Aggregation Pathways at Solid-Liquid Interfaces

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105142

关键词

surface topography; amyloid; adsorption; atomic force microscopy; pattern formation; self-assembly

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study highlights the significant impact of surface topography on protein and peptide aggregation, with the presence of nanopatterns leading to reduced fibrillization and increased amorphous aggregation. The results demonstrate that nanoscale surface topography can modulate peptide and protein aggregation pathways in complex ways.
The effects that solid-liquid interfaces exert on the aggregation of proteins and peptides are of high relevance for various fields of basic and applied research, ranging from molecular biology and biomedicine to nanotechnology. While the influence of surface chemistry has received a lot of attention in this context, the role of surface topography has mostly been neglected so far. In this work, therefore, we investigate the aggregation of the type 2 diabetes-associated peptide hormone hIAPP in contact with flat and nanopatterned silicon oxide surfaces. The nanopatterned surfaces are produced by ion beam irradiation, resulting in well-defined anisotropic ripple patterns with heights and periodicities of about 1.5 and 30 nm, respectively. Using time-lapse atomic force microscopy, the morphology of the hIAPP aggregates is characterized quantitatively. Aggregation results in both amorphous aggregates and amyloid fibrils, with the presence of the nanopatterns leading to retarded fibrillization and stronger amorphous aggregation. This is attributed to structural differences in the amorphous aggregates formed at the nanopatterned surface, which result in a lower propensity for nucleating amyloid fibrillization. Our results demonstrate that nanoscale surface topography may modulate peptide and protein aggregation pathways in complex and intricate ways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据