4.7 Article

Loss of MT1-MMP in Alveolar Epithelial Cells Exacerbates Pulmonary Fibrosis

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22062923

关键词

Matrix metalloproteinases; MMP; lung fibrosis; IPF

资金

  1. CONACYT [281074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the role of MMP14 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and found that its deficiency exacerbates fibrotic injury and affects repair, possibly through its anti-senescent activity. Increased MMP14 in IPF may represent an anti-fibrotic mechanism overwhelmed by the strong profibrotic microenvironment of the disease.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a lethal age-related lung disease whose pathogenesis involves an aberrant response of alveolar epithelial cells (AEC). Activated epithelial cells secrete mediators that participate in the activation of fibroblasts and the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix proteins. Previous studies indicate that matrix metalloproteinase 14 (MMP14) is increased in the lung epithelium in patients with IPF, however, the role of this membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase has not been elucidated. In this study, the role of Mmp14 was explored in experimental lung fibrosis induced with bleomycin in a conditional mouse model of lung epithelial MMP14-specific genetic deletion. Our results show that epithelial Mmp14 deficiency in mice increases the severity and extension of fibrotic injury and affects the resolution of the lesions. Gain-and loss-of-function experiments with human epithelial cell line A549 demonstrated that cells with a deficiency of MMP14 exhibited increased senescence-associated markers. Moreover, conditioned medium from these cells increased fibroblast expression of fibrotic molecules. These findings suggest a new anti-fibrotic mechanism of MMP14 associated with anti-senescent activity, and consequently, its absence results in impaired lung repair. Increased MMP14 in IPF may represent an anti-fibrotic mechanism that is overwhelmed by the strong profibrotic microenvironment that characterizes this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据