4.7 Review

Sequence, Chromatin and Evolution of Satellite DNA

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22094309

关键词

repetitive DNA; heterochromatin; centromeres; telomeres; CENP-A; non-B-form DNA

资金

  1. Department of Biology, Emory University
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Satellite DNA is composed of tandem repeats that are involved in cellular processes such as chromosome segregation. Most satellite DNA sequences are found at chromosome ends and exhibit high repetitiveness. While satellite DNA is often absent in genome assemblies, some sequences can be transcribed into non-coding RNAs, influencing their function.
Satellite DNA consists of abundant tandem repeats that play important roles in cellular processes, including chromosome segregation, genome organization and chromosome end protection. Most satellite DNA repeat units are either of nucleosomal length or 5-10 bp long and occupy centromeric, pericentromeric or telomeric regions. Due to high repetitiveness, satellite DNA sequences have largely been absent from genome assemblies. Although few conserved satellite-specific sequence motifs have been identified, DNA curvature, dyad symmetries and inverted repeats are features of various satellite DNAs in several organisms. Satellite DNA sequences are either embedded in highly compact gene-poor heterochromatin or specialized chromatin that is distinct from euchromatin. Nevertheless, some satellite DNAs are transcribed into non-coding RNAs that may play important roles in satellite DNA function. Intriguingly, satellite DNAs are among the most rapidly evolving genomic elements, such that a large fraction is species-specific in most organisms. Here we describe the different classes of satellite DNA sequences, their satellite-specific chromatin features, and how these features may contribute to satellite DNA biology and evolution. We also discuss how the evolution of functional satellite DNA classes may contribute to speciation in plants and animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据