4.7 Article

Optimization and characterization of pulse electrodeposited nickel selenide nanostructure as a bifunctional electrocatalyst by response surface methodology

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 36, 页码 18898-18912

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.037

关键词

Ni-Se coating; Pulse electrodeposition; Optimization; Response surface methodology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optimization of the electrocatalytic activity of pulse electrodeposited NieSe coating on nickel foam was conducted through design of experiments. The electrodeposited electrode at ambient temperature showed superior electrocatalytic performance for HER and OER due to its large electrochemically active surface area and low Tafel slopes.
The electrocatalytic activity of the pulse electrodeposited NieSe coating on nickel foam (NF) for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) was optimized by design of experiments. In this study as the first step of optimization, the condition of electrodeposition bath containing the ratio of Se/Ni, pH, and temperature was optimized. The response surface methodology (RSM) in central composite design (CCD) was used for experiments based on the parameters of the ratio of Se/Ni and pH. The prediction model after carrying out the analyses of variance (ANOVA) on the responses showed the best desirable values for the ratio of Se/Ni and pH were 0.7 and 3.6. The nanostructure NieSe electrode electrodeposited in the optimal condition requires 103 and 249 mV (vs. RHE) for delivering 10 mA/cm(2) in HER and OER, respectively. To temperature survey, the optimized NieSe electrode was synthesized at 25, 40, and 60 degrees C. Results showed that the electrode electrodeposited at the ambient temperature with large electrochemically active surface area of 8960 and low Tafel slopes of 86 and 35 mV/dec has the superior electrocatalytic performance for HER and OER, respectively. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据