4.7 Article

Double doping of V and F on Co3O4 nanoneedles as efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 38, 页码 19962-19970

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.141

关键词

Co3O4; Non-metal doping; Metal doping; Oxygen evolution reaction

资金

  1. Qingdao Science and Technology Benefiting People Special Project [20-3-4-8-nsh]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20CX02212A]
  3. Development Fund of State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing and Postgraduate Innovation Project of China University of Petroleum [YCX2020105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By double doping of metal (vanadium) and nonmetal (fluorine) in Co3O4 with nanoneedles structure, a high-activity catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) has been rationally designed, exhibiting excellent electrocatalytic performance and durability.
Rationally designing high-activity catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is of primary importance due to its sluggish kinetic process in water splitting. Herein, we report a metallic (V) and nonmetallic (F) double doping in Co3O4 with nanoneedles structure, which is synthesized through facile oil bath and annealing. Electrochemical measurements show that the Co3O4 dopped with fluorine and vanadium (F-0.2-V-Co3O4-350) only needs a low overpotential of 320 mV to afford a current density of 10 mA cm(-2), which is superior to commercial RuO2. The excellent electrocatalytic performance can be attributed to double doping of vanadium and fluorine which have strong electron absorption effect to optimize the density of electrons in Co3O4. Besides, nanoneedles structure can enlarge exposure of active sites. And its great durability is evaluated through 2000 cycles CV test. Furthermore, the optimal ratio of fluorine to vanadium and different annealing temperatures of the target catalyst are explored reasonably. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据