4.7 Article

Influence of doping level on the electrocatalytic properties for oxygen reduction reaction of N-doped reduced graphene oxide

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 51, 页码 26040-26052

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.023

关键词

Oxygen reduction reaction; Nitrogen-doped graphene; PEMFC; AFC

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology (Conacyt) [CB-259010]
  2. Conacyt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-doped reduced graphene oxide materials with varying nitrogen concentrations were successfully synthesized and evaluated for oxygen reduction reaction catalytic activity, demonstrating enhanced performance in alkaline media. The study confirmed the importance of different nitrogen species, particularly amine-like N, in enhancing the ORR catalytic activity.
Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) doped with different nitrogen (N) concentrations (5, 10, and 15 parts in weight) were successfully synthesized via hydrothermal conditions, from graphene oxide (GO) and 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (amitrole) to obtain N-5-rGO, N-10-rGO, and N-15-rGO. These N-doped materials were characterized and evaluated for the first time as catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The physicochemical characteristics confirmed the simultaneous N-doping and reduction processes with a turbostratic re-stacking of graphene layers. Nitrogen was successfully introduced as a mix of pyridine-N, amine like-N, pyrrolic-N, and quaternary bonding species into the carbon lattice. The N content were 8.1, 9.9, and 10.5 at.% for N-5-rGO, N-10-rGO, and N-15-rGO. High catalytic activity was demonstrated in alkaline media with an onset potential of similar to 0.88 V and high current density (3.9 mA cm(-2)) for N-15-rGO, leading the ORR via the 4-electron transfer pathway. The results demonstrated that the amine like-N species enhance the ORR catalytic activity in addition to pyridinic and quaternary. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据