4.7 Article

Measurement and analysis of effective thermal conductivity of LaNi5 and its hydride under different gas atmospheres

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 37, 页码 19467-19477

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.097

关键词

Effective thermal conductivity; Metal hydride; Measurement; Radial heat flow method; LaNi < sub > 5 <; sub >

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21808143]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M623031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an ETC measurement cell based on the steady-state radial heat flow method was fabricated and its reliability was confirmed. The experimental results show that the ETC of activated LaNi5 powder is lower than that of unactuated material, and it increases with pressure and thermal conductivity of filling gas. The effects of hydrogen absorption and desorption on ETC depend on hydrogen concentration and expansion/constriction of MH particles.
In this work, an ETC measurement cell based on the steady-state radial heat flow method was fabricated, and its reliability was validated by a commercial instrument. The ETCs of unactuated and activated LaNi5 powder beds were measured under various filling gases in the pressure range from 0.1 to 1.5 MPa. The experimental results show that the ETC of activated LaNi5 powder is much lower than that of the unactuated material due to the pulverization effect. The ETCs of unactuated and activated LaNi5 powder in helium atmosphere lie in the ranges of 1.04-1.63 W m-1 K-1 and 0.49-0.85 W m-1 K-1, respectively. Furthermore, the ETC increases with the increasing pressure and thermal conductivity of filling gas. The effects of hydrogen absorption and desorption on the ETC were investigated by step-by-step reaction, which depend mainly on the hydrogen concentration and expansion/constriction of MH particles. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据