4.5 Article

Aortic clamping for limiting blood loss at cesarean hysterectomy for placenta percreta: A case series

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13746

关键词

aortic clamping; placenta accreta spectrum; placenta percreta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temporary aortic clamping proved to be safe and effective in limiting blood loss during cesarean hysterectomy for placenta percreta in a retrospective case series of 15 women. The procedure significantly reduced transfusion requirements without any intra-operative or post-operative complications, showing favorable outcomes compared to other management strategies for placenta percreta.
Objective In women with placenta percreta, cesarean hysterectomy is associated with massive blood loss during dissection of bladder from lower uterine segment. We studied the safety and effectiveness of temporary aortic clamping as a method of limiting blood loss at cesarean hysterectomy in women with placenta percreta. Methods This was a retrospective case series of 15 women with placenta percreta who underwent cesarean section with total hysterectomy at KEM Hospital, Pune, India, with a technique of temporary clamping of the infra-renal aorta for reducing blood loss during hysterectomy. Results Fifteen women with placenta percreta underwent classical cesarean section followed by total hysterectomy with temporary clamping of the aorta. The procedure was associated with median estimated intra-operative blood loss of 650 ml. No woman had ureteric injury or needed post-operative intensive care. Aortic clamping for 28-70 min was not associated with any intra-operative vascular complications or post-operative ischemic lesions in the lower limbs, kidneys, or bowel. Conclusion Aortic clamping safely and effectively limited blood loss during cesarean hysterectomy for placenta percreta and thereby reduced transfusion requirements. It compares favorably with reported outcomes of other strategies of managing placenta percreta.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据