4.5 Article

High-risk HPV positivity is a long-term risk factor for recurrence after cervical excision procedure in women living with HIV

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13674

关键词

cervical excisional procedure; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; conization; HIV; recurrence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that HR-HPV positivity is a risk factor for recurrence after cervical excision in WLWH, while age older than 41 years is a risk factor for HR-HPV positivity. Therefore, women over 41 may benefit from more frequent follow-up visits. Future studies on HPV vaccination after treatment in WLWH may also be beneficial.
Objective To evaluate the risk factors for recurrence of high-grade disease after cervical excision in women living with HIV (WLWH), with a specific interest in the role of high-risk (HR-) HPV positivity. Methods Multicentric retrospective study conducted on WLWH who underwent cervical excision between January 1987 and June 2017 in six Italian institutions. The rate of high-grade recurrence was determined. Risk factors for recurrence and HR-HPV positivity were determined with the Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results A total of 271 WLWH were included in the final analysis. A high-grade recurrence was found in 58 (21.4%) patients. Age 41 years or more at inclusion and HR-HPV positivity during follow up were independently associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence with relative risks of 4.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01-8.58, P < 0.001) and 5.18 (95% CI 2.12-12.67, P < 0.01), respectively. Age 41 years or more (relative risk 1.75, 95% CI 1.01-3.04, P = 0.047) resulted as a risk factor for HR-HPV positivity during follow up. Conclusion HR-HPV positivity is a risk factor for recurrence after cervical excision in WLWH. Women older than 41 years may benefit from a long-term yearly follow up. Future studies regarding HPV vaccination after treatment in WLWH may be useful, considering the protective role of the higher probability of HPV negativity in vaccinated women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据