4.5 Article

Ultra-processed foods consumption is associated with cardiovascular disease and cardiometabolic risk factors in Brazilians with established cardiovascular events

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2021.1908963

关键词

Cardiovascular diseases; food consumption; NOVA; risk factors; ultra-processed foods

资金

  1. Hospital do Coracao (HCor) as part of the Hospitais de Excelencia a Servico do SUS (PROADI-SUS) Program
  2. Brazilian Ministry of Health
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The consumption of ultra-processed foods has been found to be associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in subjects with established CVD, with higher consumption linked to certain health issues and decreased odds of simultaneous disease presence, particularly in women.
The consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) has been associated with cardiometabolic risk factors. However, there is scarce literature on the association between UPF consumption, cardiovascular events, and cardiometabolic risk factors in subjects undergoing secondary care for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Thus, we aimed to evaluate the association between UPF consumption, CVD, and cardiometabolic risk factors in subjects with established CVD. Baseline data from 2,357 subjects participating in a Brazilian multicenter study were analysed finding a mean UPF consumption of 18.7% of their energy intake. Higher figures of UPF consumption were founded associated with an increased presence of high waist circumference, overweight, peripheral arterial disease, and with a decreased odds of the simultaneous presence of coronary arterial disease, peripheral arterial diseases, and stroke when comparing among tertiles of UPF contribution to energy intake. These associations were observed when analyzing the whole sample and women but not men. Thus, these findings should help improve strategies for CVD patients in secondary care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据