4.7 Article

Evaluation of nanopore sequencing technology to identify Salmonella enterica Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf and Orion var. 15+, 34+

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109167

关键词

Salmonella; Oxford Nanopore sequencing; Phylogenetic analysis; SNP; Variants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated nanopore sequencing and additional data analysis for successfully identifying Salmonella serotypes, finding the best workflow that enhances ONT's readiness as a subtyping and source tracking tool for the food industry applications.
Our previous study demonstrated that whole genome sequencing (WGS) data generated by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) can be used for rapid and accurate prediction of selected Salmonella serotypes. However, one limitation is that established methods for WGS-based serotype prediction, utilizing data from either ONT or Illumina, cannot differentiate certain serotypes and serotype variants with the same or closely related antigenic formulae. This study aimed to evaluate nanopore sequencing and additional data analysis for identification of Salmonella enterica Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf and S. enterica Orion var. 15+, 34+, thus overcoming this limitation. Five workflows that combined different flow cells, library construction methods and basecaller models were evaluated and compared. The workflow that consisted of the R9 flow cell, rapid sequencing library construction kit and guppy basecaller with base modified model performed best for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) analysis. With this workflow, 99.98% of matching identity between assembled genomes from ONT and that from Illumina was achieved. Less than five high-quality SNPs differed when comparing sequencing data between ONT and Illumina. SNP typing successfully identified Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf. While prophage prediction further differentiated Orion var. 15+, 34+ from the other two Orion variants. Our study improves the readiness of ONT as a Salmonella subtyping and source tracking tool for food industry applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据