4.7 Article

A dislocation mechanics constitutive model for effects of welding-induced microstructural transformation on cyclic plasticity and low-cycle fatigue for X100Q bainitic steel

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106097

关键词

Microstructure; Bainite; Welding; Fatigue; Cyclic plasticity; Heat affected zone

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [SFI/14/IA/2604]
  2. I-Form Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre [SFI/16/RC/3872]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a physically-based cyclic viscoplasticity model to capture the influence of welding-induced microstructural transformation on the fatigue response of the bainitic high-strength low-alloy steel, X100Q. The study found that a refined bainitic block structure is the primary microstructural feature contributing to monotonic and cyclic strength in the materials, while the coarsening of the bainitic lath structure leads to cyclic softening behavior.
This paper presents a physically-based cyclic viscoplasticity model to capture the influence of welding-induced microstructural transformation on the fatigue response of the bainitic high-strength low-alloy steel, X100Q. The model incorporates the strengthening effects of dislocations, microstructural boundaries and precipitates, and the softening effects of microstructural degradation and early-life fatigue damage on yield strength and nonlinear cyclic-plastic response. The model is applied to predict the constitutive responses of X100Q parent material, physically-simulated intercritical heat affected zone (HAZ) and fine-grained HAZ, based on differences in bainitic hierarchical microstructure between the materials. A refined bainitic block structure is shown to be the primary microstructural feature contributing to monotonic and cyclic strength in the materials, whereas dislocation annihilation and the concomitant coarsening of the bainitic lath structure with cyclic-plastic deformation leads to cyclic softening behaviour.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据