4.4 Article

The costs and benefits of intensive day treatment programs and outpatient treatments for eating disorders: An idea worth researching

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
卷 54, 期 7, 页码 1099-1105

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.23514

关键词

adults; day treatment programs; eating disorders; outpatient treatment; psychotherapy; scoping review; stepped care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Outpatient care and day treatment programs are common and effective treatments for adults with eating disorders, but studies suggest that they have similar treatment effects and outpatient care is more cost-effective. Despite international guidelines recommending the use of DTPs as a higher level of care in a stepped care model, there is currently a lack of research on this topic.
Outpatient care (e.g., individual, group, or self-help therapies) and day treatment programs (DTPs) are common and effective treatments for adults with eating disorders. Compared to outpatient care, DTPs have additional expenses and could have unintended iatrogenic effects (e.g., may create an overly protective environment that undermines self-efficacy). However, these potential downsides may be offset if DTPs are shown to have advantages over outpatient care. To explore this question, our team conducted a scoping review that aimed to synthesize the existing body of adult eating disorder literature (a) comparing outcomes for DTPs to outpatient care, and (b) examining the use of DTPs as a higher level of care in a stepped care model. Only four studies met the predefined search criteria. The limited results suggest that the treatments have similar effects and that outpatient care is more cost-effective. Furthermore, no studies explored the use of DTPs as a higher level of care in a stepped care model (despite international guidelines recommending this approach). Given the clear dearth of literature on this clinically relevant topic, we have provided specific avenues for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据