4.2 Article

Decolorization and mineralization of diazo dye under artificial and solar light assisted Fenton and photo-Fenton conditions

期刊

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/ijcre-2021-0002

关键词

decolorization; Evans Blue; Fenton and photo-Fenton reaction; mineralization; solar light

资金

  1. Algeria Government (Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to verify the ability of various photochemical processes to achieve total decolorization and mineralization of the diazo dye Evans Blue. Results showed that Fe(II)/H2O2/UV254 (nm) had the highest decolorization efficiency of 99.9% within 60 minutes. Substrate mineralization efficiency was evaluated using TOC and COD analysis.
The aim of this study is to verify the ability of some photochemical processes in the absence of light (Fenton) and in its presence (photolysis/UV, photo-Fenton/UV and photo-Fenton/Solar) to obtain total decolorization and mineralization of an diazo dye in aqueous solution: the Evans Blue (abbreviated as EB). Batch experiments were carried out to evaluate, on the first stage, the influence of different processes on EB decolorization and mineralization. During the second stage the optimal operational conditions like: H2O2 dosage, EB concentration and source of light were investigated. The reaction efficiencies have been compared for the same system in the dark or under the assistance of an artificial or solar light source. The obtained results showed that color removal followed the increasing order: photolysis/UV (18.2%) < Fe(II)/H2O2 (64.12%) < Fe(II)/H2O2/UV365 nm (83.4%) < Fe(II)/H2O2/solar light (86.3%) < Fe(II)/H2O2/UV254 (nm) (99.9%) with a reaction time of 60 min This improvement could be related to a better production of radicals OH center dot. In another hand, The efficiency of substrate mineralization in each process has been comparatively discussed by total organic carbon (TOC) and total chemical oxygen demand content of EB solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据