4.6 Article

Microbial signalling in colonic motility

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2021.105963

关键词

Bacteria; Probiotic; Colon; Lipopolysaccharide; Microvesicle

资金

  1. Endeavour Research Programme grant entitled Smarter Lives: New opportunities for dairy products across the lifespan from the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, New Zealand [C10X1706]
  2. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C10X1706] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sensory nerve endings in the gastrointestinal tract respond to bacterial signaling, affecting intestinal motility and microbial homeostasis through various receptors. Recent studies suggest that bacterial-derived microvesicles can impact gut motility, indicating a potential intercellular communication pathway between the GI tract and the enteric nervous system.
Sensory nerve endings within the wall of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract may respond to bacterial signalling, providing the basis for key biological processes that underlie intestinal motility and microbial homeostasis. Enteric neurons and smooth muscle cells are well known to express an array of receptors, including G-protein coupled receptors and ligand-gated ion channels, that can sense chemical ligands and other bacterially-derived substances. These include short chain fatty acids, secondary bile acids and lipopolysaccharide. For neural detection of microbial activators to occur, luminal substances must first interact with enterocytes for direct signalling or cross paracellularly. Recent studies indicate that bacterial-derived microvesicles can cross the gut epithelial barrier and affect motility. This suggests a possible intercellular communication pathway between the GI tract and the ENS. We explore the idea that bacterial microvesicles can behave as a delivery package for communication between microbe and host.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据