4.7 Review

Klebsiella pneumoniae Harboring Carbapenemase Genes in Taiwan: Its Evolution over 20 Years, 1998-2019

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106354

关键词

Antibiotic resistance; Carbapenemase; Klebsiella pneumoniae; KPC-2; OXA-48

资金

  1. Chi-Mei Medical Center Research Foundation [CMFHR 10508]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important pathogen causing various types of human infections in Taiwan, with carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (CPKP) emerging as a global threat. Understanding the epidemiology of carbapenemase producers is crucial for prevention of their spread.
Klebsiella pneumoniae ( K. pneumoniae ) is an important pathogen causing various types of human infections in Taiwan. Carbapenemases have increasingly been reported in Enterobacterales in the past two decades. Carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (CPKP), a major resistance concern that has emerged during the last decade, has become a global threat, with its related infections associated with high morbidity and mortality; however, therapeutic options for CPKP-associated infections are limited. Carbapenemases-including K. pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC)-2, New Delhi metallo- ,B-lactamase (NDM)-1, Verona integron-encoded metallo- ,B-lactamase (VIM)-1, imipenemase (IMP)-1, and oxacillinase (OXA)-48-have been reported worldwide, with a marked prevalence in different countries or areas of the world. Understanding the epidemiology of carbapenemase producers is important for the prevention of their expansion. This review examined the evolution of CPKP in the last two decades to better understand the role of CPKP in Taiwan. It discovered that the endemicity has changed from IMP-8, NDM-1 and VIM-1 to the most common KPC-2 and rapidly emerging OXA-48. Resistance epidemiology, genetic background, virulence factors, therapy, and outcomes are discussed in this paper. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据