4.6 Article

The study of volumetric wearing of PCBN/W-Re composite tool during friction stir processing of pipeline steels (X70) plates

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06932-8

关键词

Friction stir processing; Pipeline steel; PCBN; Wear; Volume track

资金

  1. Petrobras

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Friction stir welding is a solid-state joining technique that offers high strength and productivity, but high melting temperature metals like steels can cause excessive wear on welding tools. Studies using PCBN and W-Re composite tools show that even these tools are susceptible to wear during processing. Experimental data on X70 grade pipeline steel plates using these tools revealed contamination in boron-nitrogen particles and dissolved tungsten in the stir and hard zones.
Friction stir welding is a solid-state joining/processing technique that offers high strength and productivity, resulting in a microstructure similar to hot working cycles. However, high melting temperature metals such as steels cause excessive wear over welding tools, representing a significant economic issue. Most studies conducted in steels have used polycrystalline cubic boron nitride (PCBN) and W-Re composite tools, which offer a combination of high strength and hardness at high temperatures, along with high-temperature stability. However, even those tools are susceptible to tool wear. In the present study, experimental data was collected during friction stir processing of X70 grade pipeline steel plates, using W-Re and PCBN composite tools under well-controlled conditions. Profilometry and optical microscopy were used to quantify the volume loss at the welding tool due to the number of plunges and the welded distance. Torque and transverse force at the welding tool and the welded bead width were measured and related to the wear process. Tool contamination in boron-nitrogen particles and dissolved tungsten was identified at the stir and hard zones, more substantial at the latter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据