The Necessity to Recognize Processes of Radicalization from a Socio-cultural Perspective

The current paper investigates Psychoanalytic, Cognitive, Behaviorist, and Socio-cultural theories and critiques how they have (or might have) contributed to the study of radicalization. The paper asserts two arguments that lack emphasis in the current radicalization research: 1) radicalization refers to a process, and does not always refer to violent behavior; 2) radicalization research needs to pay tribute to socio-cultural, political, and historical context while designing research and discussing findings. These two points are essential to extend the concept of radicalization and to be sensitive to different research contexts and populations. Currently, the conceptualization of radicalization appears to be generalized to violent action among minority groups (mainly Muslims) in limited contexts (mostly Western countries). The article claims that Psychology can better contribute to this diverse field of interest with its well-established theoretical contributions to the understanding of human beings and its compassion to seek differences amongst people across different contexts.

Automated summary

The current paper explores the contributions of Psychoanalytic, Cognitive, Behaviorist, and Socio-cultural theories to the study of radicalization, emphasizing the need to consider radicalization as a process and to account for socio-cultural, political, and historical context in research. The article argues that Psychology, with its well-established theoretical contributions to understanding human beings and its focus on differences among people across different contexts, can better contribute to the diverse field of radicalization research.